For me, reading Marx is sometimes like wandering a maze, but
then I read a sentence or passage that raises my line of sight over the tops of
the hedges to see the whole. I begin to
see the progression of abstractions that Marx outlines.
One such sentence is in the section on Commodity Fetishism,
when Marx writes that the money form “conceals the social character of private
labour and the social relations between the individual workers, making those
relations appear as relations between material objects, instead of revealing
them plainly” (169-70). If we could see
the labor and the material conditions in which the Dollar Store items ($1 in
exchange value) are produced, then the exchange-value of these items may seem
disproportionate to the labour expended by a worker in another country in
comparison to our own.
It seems, then, that the discourse around, for example, the
working conditions of those in China who make our iPhones, would be to reveal
the reality behind the abstraction. That to me would be the point of some of
the social justice discourse on the working conditions involved in the
production of our commodities.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.