I
understand that most of Marx’s formulations are necessarily generic and that apparent
exceptions, contradictions or otherwise complications are part of the problem
he is trying to address in Capital. Think of Robert’s example of the tipped
employee and the complexity of labour-power he highlights. (I never liked the service industry for the
very reasons that wages were never clear to me).
Even
as I avoid the service industry, I cannot escape other critical questions concerning
the value of labour-power. Jonathan, for
instance, is sharp to ask whether “services have
different value because of the training” it takes to achieve its labor, and if in
such case we are also paying “for all of the value of accumulated medical
school?” Your inference that “we
consume [labor] like other commodities” seems spot on, Jonathan. I refer to chapter 6 where Marx treats
labor as a commodity. According to Marx,
what determines the value of “labour-power” is, “as in the case of every other
commodity… the labour-time necessary for the production, and consequently also
the reproduction, of this specific article” (274). How is it, we might ask, that the cost of an
hour consultation at the doctor’s office (or a law firm) is not so indicative
of its “labour-time” necessary for its production? What we must also take into account is that
the value of labour-power is also dependent of “reproduction,” not of the labor
itself (the hour consultation) but of doctor or lawyer himself.
In
Marx’s formulation, “the production of labour-power consists in his
reproduction of himself or his maintenance” (274). The value of labour-power is based on “the
value of the means of subsistence necessary for the maintenance of its owner”—one
that will vary with each individual. (I
assume that when we speak of high paying careers such as lawyers and doctors,
we are thinking of the more prestigious positions held. “Not all lawyers make a lot of money” seems
the obvious observation here, but the distribution of wages or purchase of
these as labor/commodities has other variants).
Still, our purchase of that labor/commodity does seem to take into
account the time of training and its tuition cost, as well other expenses that
fit the category of owner-maintenance prescribed here (274).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.