Jameson’s
link between the phoenix like cycle of capitalism (“During its cycles capital
exhausts its returns in the new national and international capitalist zone and
seeks to die and be reborn in some ‘higher’ incarnation, a vaster and immeasurably
more productive one . . . implantation . . . productive development, and its
financial or speculative final state” 251) and culture in “Culture and
Financial Capital” seems, in all respects, quite helpful. Jameson is right to
look to the fragmentized postmodern culture industry as relative to the stage
of capitalism US has been in over the past century. I also, like others, the
link that this ‘final stage’ provides for connecting Jameson to H&N. All of
the authors identify the current economic reality to be a different – a new –
level of Capitalism that is visible via culture and shaping that culture. While
H&N present the possibility that the intensity of globalization of the
biopolitical will, essentially, lift the global economy out of capitalism.
Jameson seems more interested in the process by which that will occur.
The looming presence in this
particular text that relates to this process is, I think, the power of “crashes”
or capital “crisis.” While the Phoenix metaphor implies rebirth, the phoenix/
capital does need to ‘die’ in order for this restoration to occur. That capital’s
stages mark it pending implosion I wonder this apocalyptic financial tumble
will bring about for culture. Given our current fusion ( a fusion that Jameson acknowledges)
of technology, economy, labor and culture- how will the culture mitigate the
crash? This thought leads Jameson to suggest that “any comprehensive new theory
of finance capitalism will need to reach out into the expanded realm of
cultural production to map its effects; indeed, mass cultural production and consumption
itself – at once with globalization and the new information technology – are as
profoundly economic as the other productive areas of late capitalism and as
fully a part of the latter’s generalized commodity system” (252). While H&N take up this issue to
discuss the culture of capital, Jameson seems to insist upon also looking at
the capital of culture.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.